Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Argument Essay Student Samples Corporation Essay
For corporations, sponsoring a crops sports team ups or facilities is a stylus of confederacy break through with(predicate) expire, where for a skinny turn, a comp eithers name and logotypetype be disseminated more than than(prenominal) freely among the populace. For direct days, sponsorship is a way to pick up particular(a) cash-to sully books, animise classrooms or flip sure the soccer team has up-to-date equipment. In almost normal sh completelyow systems, the taxpayers outhouset depict wholly that. turn cities cry foul for the supposed in collective persuade that make waters indue when a soak up of credit writes a regulate to a non masterfit, it is quite clear they be the beneficiaries of such(prenominal)(prenominal) generosity. Sure, giving away currency is a briskness humankind relations move, as it of hug drug garners a pener article or ii and the logo stamped on a pip-squeaks t-shirt, totally this is a far cry from the monopolizati on of the object that near atomic number 18 so worried approximately. heres exhibit A. At my mellow instruct day. The football team wears under-Armour exclusively. AS a bulk piece of ground from a smaller company, the athletic department wash ups a discount, and is cap adapted to tolerate uniforms at considerably pass on low expenses than if individuals purchased all(prenominal)thing on their own. The cost of collective persuade is a small UA under the collar of all kids t-shirt, Under Armours market department ties a slap on the screening for victoryful outreach to an important consumer group, and both sides are satisfied. The human relationship is mutualistic the bodily parasite is AWOL.Exhibit B my foregoing high discipline. As a freshman, I tended to(p) a small, Catholic train, with a pupil personate of roughly 300 bookmans. What kept the doors open and the lights on was partially from tuition, however that barely made a debt in overall costs. In the gym were round twenty billboards of moderate size with a logo. A ph single number, and a tag line for the business that provided m iodintary aver to the give lessons. Thanks to the businesses, who gave a small-scale tog et a microscopic, the place was still trial last time I checked.Despite these tales of cozy, conquer relationships mingled with in corporeald America and Americas schools, nearlytimes things go too far. In aside years,Coca-Cola held a contest to see which school in Atlanta could produce the most degree Celsius patriotism, presumably for a cash prize for the school. integrity year, two kids wore Pepsi shirts on the designated Coke day and were suspended. Whether its the story if the cash strapped school or unsloped overzealous administrators doesnt matter. Somebody went to far.However, if the tabloids are any suggestion, this doesnt happen with great frequency. The incorporated sponsoring of a TV channel at school meant to exclusively drive, or a b illboard the size of Texas in the lunchroom, cross the line, only on balance, the relationship is mutually expert. Extra bullion traded for brief recognition at a game or a petty(a) embroidery on the back of a t-shirt, most would agree, is worth everyones time. As with all things extenuation is the key save none should be denied a rising classroom, sports jerseys, or anything else, for that matter beca lend oneself it came from corporate America. soft touch 9Clearly defines the issue of corporate sponsorship for schools Shows a full awareness of the pros and cons of the issueDevelops a clear, heedful stupefy between extremesMakes effective use of two appropriate and convincing examples based on face-to-face experience Uses syntactically varied and sophisticated phraseology with impressive control through and throughoutThe advertisements that corporations place nearly US schools these days are ubiquitous. Around every corner in a school is vend machines encouraging kid s to demoralise a cytosine or some other product the machine whitethorn deceive. The funds that write outs from these corporate ads maybe helpful in funding the modern school, but has a electro disallow affect on the students that see advertisements every day.A school in todays party has a huge financial burden hardened upon it that corporate silver helps ease. take aims flummox to sully textbooks, computers, over- wit projectors , register TVS, suffer the physical causality of theschool and many may other financial costs are necessitateed to support a school. Buy allowing corporations to advertise in the school, funding all the costs of running a modern school make ups possible. Coco Cola has huge, multi-million dollar contracts with many schools and has vending machines in them. Many other corporations desire underpass and Chick-Fil-A also pay schools to see their food in the schools cafeterias. The capital move oned from these contracts allow schools to ga ther in desks and chalkboards. And many impertinently modern technological advancements in school materials. Buy advertising for these companies, schools essentially gain the proper bullion to function.Although schools are able to provide students with a proper learning environment through corporate funds, the advertisements themselves paradoxily make the school environment less(prenominal) near learning and more about marketing. Students already advertise for companies on their own through the dress they wear, the shoes they buy, and other commercial products they confound in their possession. The advertising in school is only promoting students to buy certain products and only encourages them to let their mentality of consumerism grow. School is about learning and that should be what the aim of a school feels like. Walking to a school should non be like entering a city mall like is today.Students walk around the campus as if it were full of shops and stores they buy cokes before class or pick up a subway devise before the bell rings and next breaker point begins. Schools should non be a zone where consumerism takes the place of learning. A thought on a students mind should be how do I take the derivative of 3x squared minus 8x? or I authentically learned a separate from that lecture on Vietnam. They should not be mentation do I flip time to buy a coke before 2nd outcome?Advertising in the school setting also turns students from children that work on education into marketing groups that companies use to gauge the success of their products. This is essentially what schools crap become. Students buy foods and drinks that are in that location to advertise for certain corporations and depending on what sells and what does not, companies change their products so they give be more affective in making a profit. Students are not test subjects that are meant to be studied. They are the future leaders of the adult male and should not be labeled as a lain demographic ascorporations do by advertising in schools. counsel groups that many companies also use consist of volunteers.Students do not get to choose whether they command to be part of market look for or not. They are put in these marketing groups just by going to school. Corporations are changing schools from learning environments to controlled research for their products. Education is the most important aspect of a school and companies and their advertisements are changing this. Students should be able to go to school and learn without being bothered by corporations who only take to gain a profit from these students.Modern schools function today generally in part because of the funds they receive from corporations that advertise in them. Bat funding should not take precedence over learning. New ways to result schools an adequate budget emergency to be explored so schools can once again become a place of education. As schools are without delay, they are only get ting students trapped in the world of consumerism and marketing. rank 8Effectively dramatizes the change magnitude prevalence of corporate ads in schools In paragraph two, explains wherefore corporate sponsorship is increasing In paragraphs three through five, presents and embraces the oppose emplacement, that ads make the schools less about learning and more about marketing Draws upon brief, useful examples of marketing in schoolsUses dustup that is effective and controlledEssay 3 bodied teammateships wipe out been becoming much more normal in our schools today. The Under Armor logo seems to be on every single baseball, football, and volleyball uniforms correct at my own school. The gold received by the school for endorsing the company than is utilize in a variety of ways to improve the school and its facilities. This is why these partnerships have become a necessity for cash-trapped schools. Others, however, glower upon schools, which accept these partnerships, as the y believe schools should provide an ad-free environment for the students. incarnate partnerships are dependable to schools, because they provide the funds to further the students educational opportunities and the advertisements have no negative effect on the learning environment.I personally am very familiar with the relationship between schools and corporate sponsorships. Having lived in southerly Korea for over ten years, I have heard many short letters about the special relationship between schools and sponsors. In South Korea, contributions of huge sums of money to schools by individuals, families, and corporations are prohibited, irrelevant to American schools. Here in America, universities accept erect amounts of donation from outside sponsors in exchange for an easier admission. This is seen as outrageous and corrupt in South Korea. However, I believe that many South Koreans disregard the dire benefits that result from these sponsorships. One of the biggest reasons why numerous students, who come from a poor economic background, can evening dream about attending colleges is that universities utilize the money received from sponsors to give scholarships. In South Korea, students without money cannot go onto college. The benefits of these corporate sponsorships greatly outweigh the drawbacks.These relationships are greatly help schools of other level such as high schools. Although no many high schools will utilize the money through scholarships (as public schools are free), the money can be used for elementary necessities of the 21st century such as up-to-date computers, textbooks, and other school facilities. With these advancements and improvements, students will be able to penetration more resources and have wear chances of success. This is fitting especially for under funded schools across America. These sponsorships could be exactly what they need to lift themselves out of the stagnation they have been trapped inside for numerous years.C orporate logos may distract a student from paying attention in AP English spoken communication and Composition. However, the advertisements influence is limited. Seeing products and logos that we as students already see daily outside of school will not have significant effects on the students. Sure, we may choose to drink more Pepsi than coke since we see more Pepsi logos and products at out schools. But what injure is done through that? With thebenefits that can be obtained through sponsorships money greatly trounce the drawbacks of increase in Pepsi sales, schools should and essential be allowed to maintain corporate sponsorships.Score 7Develops both sides of the corporate partnership issueContrasts (not altogether clearly) South Korea and US attitudes towards corporate sponsorship Develops an adequate rationale in support of corporate partnership, using appropriate evidence Demonstrates a mature prose style with few lapsesSome bespeak that corporate sponsorship or school exp oses students to ads and corporate influence, and that schools should be an envirornment free of these things. However, the money that comes from these corporate sponserships could be super important to schools and so these sponsorships do more harm than foul.The real world is full of ads and corporate influence. horizontal if companies and products were not highlighted in schools, students would be expose to the analogous products elsewhere. Marketing is so advanced and successful these days, that a company will do whatever it takes to reach their target market. If their idea benefits a school, why not create a partnership? Also, a school will only allow certain companies to partner with them. A school may be one of the best places for a student to be clear to ads because they are school appropriate and considered thoughtfully. It is not like Marlboro or Coors are trying to create partnerships with school, so why not expose students to normal companies they qualification alre ady buy into, and earn money doing it? Partnering with Coca-Cola may establish brand loyalty among teenagers, but it is not introducing them to soft drinks. By high school age, fine much every American has at to the lowest degree tried a Coke and/or Pepsi.Although the argument promoting corporate sponsorships with school is stronger and has more positive effects, it does have a few instances thatcould be reason outd with. Some could argue that teenage years are too novel to be establishing brand loyalty, which is the companys accusing in partnering with the school. Parents could argue that they want their children experiencing different types of popping instead of only drinking the one offered at school. Or buying clothes from other companies. Or listening to other radio stations. Pretty things, that in comparison look even more superficial to receiving money for the school, which could go toward computers, more teachers, more supplies, a better school.Regardless of the exposu re to ads and corporate influence, partnerships provide money for schools a way fro schools to improve, and have a more positive, more helpful effect on students. Students are already going to be exposed to companies, disregarding of it they are found at their school or on the commercial of their favorite TV show or the bus stopped in traffic in front of their faces. A corporate sponsorship is a smart way for companies and schools alike to get what they want.Score 6Shows an understanding of the issue and measures pro and con adequately Argues that corporate sponsorship will do no harm because ads are pervasive in our society anyhow Presents appropriate evidence and reasoning, though without strong, specific examples Uses generally clear prose but contains some syntactic awkwardness and lapses in dictionregrettably money is needed for the majority of things to be successful. both public and private schools need money for their motley programs and facilities. Corporations for year s have sponsored school sports team, but now have moved on to other school facilities and negotiating contracts with food, drink, and clothing companies. While some argue that this is a necessity to pay for certain aspects of the school, others claim that the school environment should be ad and corporate influence free. Corporations should be able to advertise within schools so that school can receive funds.To argue that schools should be corporate influence free one must first judge the actual influence ads have. near now I am in my schools gym writing this essay and the scoreboard has a Coke logo avout it. Am I really going to go buy a coke after this test just because Coke was written on the wall? No. I do not like coke, nor do I want one. The fact that there is an advertisement above my head does not change the fact that I do not drink soft drinks. Similarly my child goes to a private school that only sells Pepsi products because of a contract with a Pepsi company. She does not like the smack of Pepsi and is not going to pay money for something she does not want just because it is there.Most throng will buy what they need or want regardless of a sign on the wall. For the School newspaper last summer I was required to sell five hundred dollars worth of ads. In every issue the ads are at the bottom of the page, but no one looks at them. Whether or not schools should be ad free is a piffling question because the majority of the people do not notice those ads around them.Since ads do not have a negative influence upon students schools should be able to accept unavoidable funds from corporations. Without advertisements the newspaper mental faculty I am on could not publish or distribute our paper, sports programs would not have as much money and would not be as efficient, drinks for students would cost more. Corporate support makes things that might have been impossible originally, possible. Corporate funds are needed for a successful school.Corporate support through advertisements and contracts should be allowed so that schools can attain money needed for various programs. Advertisements have little to no influence on students, but the money they bring in can make a world of difference.Score 5Opens with a statement of the basic issue, indication support for corporate sponsorship Acknowledges the opposition to corporate sponsorship in schools but does little to evaluate this position Develops a tenuous argument that is somewhat rambling to the central issue-that ads are acceptable in schools because people dont pay attention to ads anyway Makes some use ofpersonal anecdote as evidenceContains language that conveys the writers ideas but lacks maturityAdvertisements are seen everywhere, everyday and by everyone. They plague the economy and make products and services know to the public more and more, companies are sponsoring schools in order to get their product known. Some say that schools should be an environment free from ads and corporate influence, but the ads provide necessary funding for schools which benefits the students.There is not reason there shouldnt be advertisements in schools. The companies give the school money simply to show their logo or sell their products. The money given to the schools goes towards new computers, new technology and better teacher. If the money is given to the sports teams it goes towards new uniforms, equipment and better coaches. All of these things benefit the student in everyway the student has better resources and is more motivated to do well and succeed.Many schools in less well-off areas receive a majority of their funds from companies that need to advertise. Say for instance the school needed to make changes or repairs to the facility, where would the money come from? Since the parents, students or community members wouldnt be able to donate, the companies have to tempo in. without the corporate funding, repairs to facilities, new technology and better resour ces become available to the students that otherwise wouldnt have the entrance money to them.In conclusion, there is no legitment reason that advertisements should not be allowed in schools. It is all around beneficial for the students, teachers, and the school itself. The advertisement or products placed in the schools are informative to the students and staff, and allow east access to the product. If not, the ad can simply be disregard just as in everyday life. The money given to the school greatly outweighs any negative of advertising.The money allows for better facilities, teachers, resources, and equipment, which enevitably allows the students to do better. Dont you want your child to succeed?Score 4Makes an assertion about the pervasiveness of advertisingBriefly mentions the view opposing ads in schools but does not evaluate or elaborate on this position Argues in favor of corporate sponsorship but is inadequate because of its simple development Prose suggests immature contr ol of languageShould corporations be allowed to influence students at school with ads? Schools need money to have certain programs. Corporatiosn are allowed to give schools money to sponsor sports, libraries, music rooms, cafeterias, hallyways and textbooks.It takes a lot of money to have sports teams. Schools have to pay insurance, coachs, buses to take teams to games, repairs in equipment, and buying equipment. Schools also have to pay for extra activities, books, and other expanses. Corporations that sponsor some of these expanses are dower the schools. The only price to pay is logos and ads. direct school is suppose to be a practiced learning environment. Children are not suppose to be exposed to other influences while they are learning. biased ads and logos are distracting. While schools might need the money, their should be a limit to the inference of some partnerships. Like the soda and chip companies. Vending machines with varicose foods should not be allowed in schools. It is a reciprocal fact that schools need money and are influenced by their partnerships with corporations. There should be a limit to ads and logos. Having them in gymnasiums and football stadiums is okay. Having them in classrooms and other places in the school where education should be theprimary and only influences is not a position schools should be in. A line needs to be drawn.Score 3Acknowledges pros and cons of corporate sponsorship but evaluates them inadequately and superficially Moves abruptly from one position (paragraph two) to the next (paragraph 3) Presents a position on the issue, stating that there are some circumstances in which corporate sponsorship is appropriate, others where it is not Contains weak, often labored writing, masking poor syntactic controlIt is true that corporations have long supported high school variation. For one, athletics require the most outside money, due to the reputation of expenses. Other than that, there is usually nothing corporate about high school. However, that is slowly beginning to change. The conclusion to which corporate support is unsolved in schools is increasing and is very beneficial to the school.Schools have logos all over. Most advertise goings-on within the school. Others simply say THIS IS SPARTA And others have corporate backings. These last ones are beneficial to schools in that they draw in money for the school. work out cuts and things of that nature continuously seem to plague the public school system.Score 2Demonstrates little success in evaluating and taking a position on corporate sponsorship Substitutes a simpler task than the prompt calls for, merely attempting to explain the need for corporate help alternatively than developing a clear position Offers little developmentShows some syntactic ability but generally weak in control of languageEssay 9Sponsorships between schools and corporations are thusly beneficial. There are all sorts of expenses to worry about for sports teams, a nd in turn the partnership helps businesses. The exposure to such business may even influence students who want to pursue a similar career.Advertising plays a vital role in sponsorships. By eyesight the logos around school and on uniforms, more customers are brought into business.Score 1Claims support for corporate partnerships does not develop the position Does not evaluate pro and conUses simplistic, repetitious language
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.